The Conservatives preferred to look at the Communist threat blind to the realities at home. In trying to find out who we should be as Republicans we must first look back in history to see what the party stood for. Many in the party, hard-line conservatives for the most part, are calling for a return to the roots of the Republican Party. Fair enough. I think that is precisely what we should do. And to do this, the facts that can be bothersome to some must be brought to the forefront of this internal debate. The roots of the party, of course, must be from the very beginning of its conception.

The Republican Party was formed in the late 1850’s in response to the democrats who supported the expansion of slavery into the new territories, which the new party was vehemently opposed to. The party was from the beginning, a progressive party and by no means a conservative one. It was a party that sought to modernize the country, not to keep the status quo especially if the status quo was not working for Americans. They sought to modernize the country by supporting higher education, free homesteads to farmers (a rather non-conservative thing to do), free soil policies against slavery, banking, railroads, industry and cities.

This was a party that not only was aiming for the rural vote via homesteads, but also one that had a heavy lean towards urban America. Again something that is not apparent with today’s conservative controlled Republican Party. It was a party that believed industry and free markets were superior to slave driven ones. These were the founding principles of the party and it is these principles that should define real republicanism instead of what has crept into the party over the last few decades. Taking into account these founding ideas must also include Abraham Lincoln himself who was a man of principle as well as pragmatism in being the first iconic leader of the Republican Party. Lincoln from his early years warned against the slave holding southerners continuing power growth of the government.

That’s exactly what it is - history. Blacks have been voting 90%+ Democrat for decades now.

“The GOP is an American political party and is not owned by any particualr race, it should pander to its ideals not to racist groups black or white.”

I agree, but the GOP isn’t going to win any minority votes with its “ideals” while the Democrats are offering them racial spoils politics. “Affirmative Action” trumps “Color-Blind Society”. If Republicans took a hard stance against mass immigration and racial spoils, they’d gain a lot more in white votes than they’d lose in minority votes. Instead, they seem dead set on trying to out-pander the Democrats.

This stupidity trend, this isn’t the first time it’s happened. The culture creators always, in any country, give the people an anti-intellectual culture when they get ready to put boots on the ground and flip society into an authoritarian dictatorship. If you think this can’t happen here, know too that people in China, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Russia, Germany, Congo, and many other places thought the exact same thing about where they lived. History repeats itself because people do not learn from history. And it’s happening here in America now, and ultimately the rest of the world will follow. A one world tyranny, your bible warned you this would come about in the end times (so did the koran and the religious books of every other religion).

I personally invite anyone to write to me and feel free to ask questions (when is the last time a politician told you that? Or a priest?) Just know that wisdom comes with patience, and humbleness, and i honestly can’t show you everything i know and how it all connects to the big picture, in one day. I’ve been at this for half my life. No need to be defensive, as my goal is not to offend anyone. But… often times un-biased truth does offend and this can’t always be avoided. But it’s not my intent to offend anyone.

At the same time whites are racist against themselves in the name of PCness, because they’ve been made for so long to be walking on egg shells now even trying to discuss race. Or even bringing it up. And so theyr afraid of offending people to the point of sticking their heads up the butts of black or brown (and also feminist) supremacists, and beating themselves up for things they had nothing personally to do with, in the name of PCness…. I think part of this ultimately falls down to everyone wanting to belong to a categorized group… Don’t let the man sell you an identity, because you’ll become trapped behind that identity. The conspiracy is to keep everyone divided. They want a New World Order. But it’d take me a long time to go into all of that here (I’ve been studying this for 15 yrs, and the conspiracy goes back all the way to the beginning of recorded history, it’s very deep deep shit).

Personally, I don’t believe in race, as racism tends to exist in ALL races, black, white, brown, red, yellow, etc…. I think it’s a lot of divide and conquor coming from the man (who can be any color because these elites exist in every culture around the world– and of coarse they themselves are puppets, like the politicians here). They give us this “liberal vs. conservative” dialectic much the same way here in the USA, to water shit down, so nobody can think outside the box… The only real difference between liberal and conservative is that one is biased against majorities (whites, males) and the other is biased against minorities (ethnics, females). But racism won’t die until people stop seeing race, stop speaking this illusion into existence, and begin holding people to their conduct and their actions as individuals, not as a part of a collective. Racism is not natural, other animals do not practice racism. Dogs don’t fight over being from different breeds. Hell, human children don’t notice skin color until they learn it from school or their parents…. Watch toddlers play, they don’t see black, white, brown, red, yellow, they just see their friends they wanna play with. That’s all.

That is exactly right! It seems that this Alternative Right magazine could almost be a beard for leftists trying to smear conservatism.

“And while neoconservatism is surely a phenomenon of a particular time and place, the disposition toward reality that animates it is how wise and moderate men will always see the world — even in the most ­immoderate of ages.”

While this is how the ideology started out, it certainly hasn’t remained this way, especially on Foreign Policy.

“I will send you a proposal to double the budget of the National Endowment for Democracy, and to focus its new work on the development of free elections, free markets, free press, and free labor unions in the Middle East. And above all, we will finish the historic work of democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq, so those nations can light the way for others, and help transform a troubled part of the world.” - George W. Bush, State of the Union Address

It moved from being merely hawkish ideology to some form of Neo-Wilsonianism not based in reality, but base on the same utopian ideas that liberals believe in. This idea that Government can change what’s in a man’s heart, that the Federal Government has the right to dictate to people how they should live. It’s the same Big Government ideology just wrapped up in hawkish conservative rhetoric, but at the end of the day its not real conservatism. To believe that America invading Iran some how benefits us when we are overextended in Afghanistan, and Iraq with massive amounts of debt, and deficits crippling us at home, is not conservative. There is a reason why realists like Brent Scowcroft opposed our engagement in Iraq (http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110002133), and why conservatives like William F. Buckley, and Chuck Hagel turned against the war, because America cannot afford nation-building. Robert Taft was right, and it’s not isolationism to admit that America does not have the resources, or an infinite amount funds to police the world.

Can tanks in Saudi Arabia prevent 17 men with razor blades from sneaking on to Air Planes? No, it’s unfortunate, but massive militaristic approaches rarely ever stop terrorism. Realism needs to take the lead again in American Foreign Policy and the Party of Eisenhower, Reagan, and Bush 41 should not be afraid to re-embrace such a view point.

Let me repeat again is it cash or credit, that will be used to pay for Senator Connor’s expenses?

No wait maybe all of you guys have banded together for your allowance money, better yet maybe some of that financial aid money you guys get from the tax-payers to pay for Senator Connors fees.

What’s embarrassing is that Mr.Judge, and the team that you are involved with better yet I wouldn’t be surprised if this is Jonathan Judge himself posting since we know he never posts his real name anymore on various blogs since virtually every Republican in Kings County hates you, are involved in continuing to try and hurt real “Urban Republicans” such as Kenneth Rice the only candidate in the 44th Council District who lives on his own, and in this district.

Let me ask you another question since we know you read these comments, and you have nothing else better to do.

Since Jonathan lives at home with his Mother and Father, how can Jonathan claim to understand the needs of those in the 44th Council District when he has never held a real job other than a patronage job given to him by Democrats, and has never paid any bills or lived on his own two things he has fully admitted.

Also since Jonathan is so “Conservative”, and claims he can make in-roads in this district, why is it that his Mother and Father aren’t even registered “Republican”?

Some “Urban Republican” he can’t even get his Parents to become “Republican” some leader.

What Republicans will Jonathan help in this election cycle other than another divisive figure Lucretia Regina Potter who claimed to be a business owner, but yet her business Bari Tile and Stone on 8024 17th Avenue has a for sale sign and has for months, and now turns out is an unemployed homemaker who lives with her father.

Payback will come to Mr. Judge as Mr. Judge owes his job on community board 14 to the Democrats as fact as the Dem District Leaders in the 44th Council District have told the “Re I mean Democrat” to get out of the race or else.

If the 44th Council District loved Jonathan Judge so much why did Ken Rice get over 200 signatures more than Mr. Judge when it came to pounding the pavement?

If the 44th Council District loved Jonathan Judge so much why did Ken Rice get well over the minimum amount of signatures, something Mr. Judge didn’t?

If the 44th Council District loved Jonathan Judge so much than why couldn’t he get registered voters to help him carry petitions?

Bottom line Jonathan Judge has been an “Enemy” to “Urban Republicans”, and has denied Women the opportunity to make a difference in his club such as Kings County Republican Party Youth Activities Chair Lesli Rice as she herself admitted Mr. Judge denied her entry to the Brooklyn Young Republicans.

By the way before I go, speaking of Gerry O’Brien, didn’t Jonathan Judge support a candidate for the City Council in “Convicted Felon” George Smith, a man who is a “Loose Cannon” to say the least, and hasn’t met a buffet line he didn’t make, not to mention a “Carpetbagger”.

Doesn’t that make guilt by association when it comes to Jonathan?

Sad truth is Jonathan will do all he can to defeat “Urban Republicans”, and is now posting in the third person when it comes to this, Jonathan you are one sad fellow..

Jonathan I am putting the kerosene on your political career.

Remember to support the real “Urban Republican”, on March 23rd the 100% Conservative who doesn’t owe his job to the Democrats, in Ken Rice, the only candidate who lives in this district, and the only candidate with experience to keep our streets safe.

Ken Rice March 23rd, 44th Council District, “Neighborhood Reform”.

Don’t let the door hit you Mr. Judge and Co. on the way out than again we know you will be posting in your Mom’s basements on Atlas Shugs.

Mr. Judge has not given a single dime nor any help to the Kings County Republican Party.

His silence at several Kings County Republican Party meetings toward his non support of his predecessor in the 2009 City Council Race Bob Capano a friend of “Urban Republicans” in the 43rd district which was the most competitive race against any incumbent city council member is deafening.

Mr. Judge is also involved in a blog called Atlas Shrugs, and the person who just commented that was the brain child of him and several members of the club during a policy meeting he held where he is president of the Brooklyn Young Republicans in which has regularly attacked Kings County Republican Party Chairman Craig Eaton, State Senator Marty Golden, and hindered the chances again of Mr. Judge’s predecessor Bob Capano in the 43rd council district the most competitive race against any incumbent in the 2009 City Council elections.

Mr. Judge has posted several articles on blogs of various sites routinely bashing the Kings County Republican Party, and it’s candidates even those who are “Urban Republicans”.

Mr. Judge has also tied himself toward two very controversial figures in the Kings County Republican Party in Arnaldo Ferraro, and Lucretia Regina Potter.

This is why 33 out of 36 the executive committee members of the Kings County Republican Party voted against him.

If he was any bit of an “Urban Republican” he would have been supported by members of the Kings County Republican Party.

However, he has resorted to tactics worse than a “Democrat” by using known liberal Democrat former State Senator Marty Connor someone who has for years tried to defeat “Urban Republicans”, and harm Republicans across the board.

One question for the Judge supporter, Cash or Credit?

Since we know Senator Connor doesn’t accept IOU’s.

Another quick reminder for the Judge team, since they have a blog called Atlas Shrugs that regularly blocks those who post opinions opposite to what Mr. Judge’s blog says, and store’s IP address’s of those who disagree with the views of the Judge campaign team, Is that Castro like or what?

Didn’t Jonathan himself fabricate the Gerry Obrien incident, when Marty Cottingham who was present at this incident disputed Jonathan’s claims.

Jonathan Judge also denied membership of a woman into his club, Lesli Rice because she explained to him correctly the City’s campaign finance laws.

If conservative ideas were brought out so much by the Judge campaign than why couldn’t he collect the valid number of signatures to make the ballot.

How many of the Brooklyn YR’s actually collected signatures for Mr. Judge curious?

If that club was so strong he would have got at least more signatures than Ken Rice right?

Also why hasn’t he time and time again gone on blogs to attack Republicans who were actually conservative?

Why is he complaining about the election laws now, when he tried to use them to his advantage?

Good riddance.

Remember to support the real “Urban Republican”, on March 23rd the 100% Conservative who doesn’t owe his job to the Democrats, in Ken Rice, the only candidate who lives in this district, and the only candidate with experience to keep our streets safe.

Ken Rice March 23rd, 44th Council District, “Neighborhood Reform”.

Don’t let the door hit you Mr. Judge and Co. on the way out.

We Need A Republican Revolution In 2010! Throw The Bums Out, Starting With The Brooklyn Republican Party Leadership And Their Filthy Paid Hacks! Throw Out All The Bums In Albany and Washington! Tea Party 365!

Scientific racists recently rebranded their pseudoscience as ‘HBD’ (for ‘human biodiversity,’ which used to be a perfectly good term for the real science of human population biology before it was hijacked). A number of HBD advocates promote white nationalism, while white nationalists (WNs) are picking up the rhetoric of HBD. This HBD/WN convergence overlaps with fascism. ‘Radical traditionalism,’ like HBD, is just a politically correct euphemism. The term was originally associated with postwar esoteric fascists, especially Evola. So if you hear anyone say that they are a ‘radical traditionalist’ and into HBD, you now know what their actual agenda is.

What Alternative Right represents is an attempt by white nationalists, neofascists, and neo-eugenicists to mainstream themselves within the larger conservative movement.

For more information, see One STDV, Richard Hoste’s website HBD Books, and VDARE.

Clarence